The Legacy of Women Writers and Hidden Narratives
- Hiya Jain
- Jan 31, 2024
- 2 min read
In the realm of literature, using male pseudonyms has served as a cloak of invisibility for many women writers giving them a voice which would otherwise be bound by the shackles of gender expectations. It served as one of the means for navigating the storied waters of a world historically dominated by the penmanship of men. As Marie Shear provocatively posited, "Feminism is the radical notion that women are people." This statement poignantly addresses the disheartening reality that the seemingly basic concept of being treated equally is, in itself, something of revolutionary intelligence. Using the pen name was sought as the crusade of liberation without the coveted recognition. It becomes apparent that this practice was a calculated maneuver born out of a necessity to engage with a larger audience without trespassing the layers of judgement preconceived in people's minds regarding the appropriateness of a subject matter. Charlotte Brontë, a trailblazing figure in literature renowned for her masterpiece 'Jane Eyre', exemplified this narrative. When she assumed the pen name 'Currer Bell,' Brontë candidly articulated the sentiments that led to this decision, stating, "We did not like to declare ourselves women, because – without at that time suspecting that our mode of writing and thinking was not what is called ‘feminine’ – we had a vague impression that authoresses are liable to be looked on with prejudice." The sisters' works predominantly played with themes of patriarchy and gender roles within a prejudiced society. This practice reverberated across history, as evidenced with other influential authors who protected their identity by necessary subterfuge. George Eliot, born Mary Ann Evans, embraced a pseudonym to ensure her novels were taken seriously as she believed that a male alias would discourage stereotyping herself and her works before it even hits the shelves. Expanding on this historical lens reveals that the practice of women adopting male pseudonyms goes beyond individual anecdotes, representing a collective response to the intersectionality of gender, class and societal expectations. The example of Alice Bradley Sheldon offers a compelling illustration. She had published books under her own name but when it came to venture genres where male authors were more likely to be acknowledged like science fiction, she took a male pen name. She later stated in an interview with Asimov’s Science Fiction magazine that “a male name seemed like good camouflage. I had the feeling that a man would slip by less observed. I’ve had too many experiences in my life of being the first woman in some damned occupation.” As we peel the layers of literary history and transcend the advancement in attitude towards women writers, each pseudonym becomes a beacon of empowerment in the broader story of women's tenacity, creativity, and unwavering commitment to express their own opinions and beliefs.